The third one from the top (“Subject: TodayScience…”) came to one of my email accounts and was correctly flagged as spam. You are right…below is a copy of the log from the last time I downloaded mail. If there’s no “Predicted: Good” for that message in the other account, that means your mail program was not set up to ask SpamSieve to examine that other message. If it says “Predicted: Spam” that means that’s what SpamSieve originally thought (for that message in that account note that the identifiers are different). No, SpamSieve never goes back to alter the log. …and on this second block of the same log, you can see I trained the spam mail that came into my other account and went through (the one that allows this spam to get through): =Īctions: added rule to SpamSieve blocklist, added rule to SpamSieve blocklist, added to Spam corpus (7257) Subject: TodayScience: Shocking news for obese-people This is an extract of the log on one of the same spam mails, in which you can see that in the first block the spam has been correctly identified as such when it came into one of my my accounts (the one that correctly catches spam): = What I need to to then is to check the log before I perform any action on the incoming mails. What happens is that I’m training as spam all those that get through and that seems to alter the “Predicted” parameter on the log. Well unfortunately I can’t tell for sure, but it seems to be that way. The following is a copy of my statistics:ĭo you mean that for the other account the log says “Predicted: Good” for those messages? Otherwise SpamSieve is doing a great job in selecting all other spam…it’s just these pesky spams from two or three different places that get through all time. I have even went to Blocklist and added those server addresses, but they still get through.Īll these emails are blatant spams, no way you can even doubt they might be legit. I’ve got several email accounts and some of those same spam emails get through on some of the accounts and on the other mail accounts they are correctly filtered as spam by spamSieve. Some of those mails come from exactly the same address and even though I’ve Trained them as Spam numerous times, they still get through. But now I’m starting to get some junk mail that is not being filtered correctly. In any event the file isn’t living there and the plug in still fails to install for me (SIP off).Been using it flawlessly for the past several years…thanks SpamSieve. Getting to the Folder that way to delete it fails because of the above anomaly in typing in the dialog box. Getting to the folder in the Go To Folder. However (7.1.1.1, Part C,5) the write command does no good. You can set the EnableBundles OK and confirm by trying it a second time to get a nil file. Your instruction line added to the online manual didn’t help.Īlso frustrating (yes, Terminal was not set to Full Disk Access, which I fixed and retested)… Finding DataVaults Folder. Did not try turning off spelling correction, but it’s very frustrating. If the system finds no file once, it tries to correct the next occurrence of part of that direction to something else that may exist (fix your typing?). Michael, Re your last email, think I figured out why the recommended method Manual 7.1.1.1 D(Manually Delete DataVaults) to access from Go To Folder: ~/Library/Containers//Data
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |